APA
Click to copy
Cajigas, I., Davis, K. C., Meschede-Krasa, B., Prins, N., Gallo, S., Naeem, J., … Jagid, J. (2021). Implantable brain–computer interface for neuroprosthetic-enabled volitional hand grasp restoration in spinal cord injury. Brain Communications.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Cajigas, Iahn, Kevin C. Davis, Benyamin Meschede-Krasa, N. Prins, S. Gallo, J. Naeem, Anne E. Palermo, et al. “Implantable Brain–Computer Interface for Neuroprosthetic-Enabled Volitional Hand Grasp Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury.” Brain Communications (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Cajigas, Iahn, et al. “Implantable Brain–Computer Interface for Neuroprosthetic-Enabled Volitional Hand Grasp Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury.” Brain Communications, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{iahn2021a,
title = {Implantable brain–computer interface for neuroprosthetic-enabled volitional hand grasp restoration in spinal cord injury},
year = {2021},
journal = {Brain Communications},
author = {Cajigas, Iahn and Davis, Kevin C. and Meschede-Krasa, Benyamin and Prins, N. and Gallo, S. and Naeem, J. and Palermo, Anne E. and Wilson, A. and Guerra, Santiago and Parks, Brandon and Zimmerman, Lauren L. and Gant, K. and Levi, A. and Dietrich, W. and Fisher, L. and Vanni, S. and Tauber, John and Garwood, Indie C. and Abel, John H. and Brown, E. and Ivan, Michael E. and Prasad, A. and Jagid, J.}
}
Abstract Loss of hand function after cervical spinal cord injury severely impairs functional independence. We describe a method for restoring volitional control of hand grasp in one 21-year-old male subject with complete cervical quadriplegia (C5 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A) using a portable fully implanted brain–computer interface within the home environment. The brain–computer interface consists of subdural surface electrodes placed over the dominant-hand motor cortex and connects to a transmitter implanted subcutaneously below the clavicle, which allows continuous reading of the electrocorticographic activity. Movement-intent was used to trigger functional electrical stimulation of the dominant hand during an initial 29-weeks laboratory study and subsequently via a mechanical hand orthosis during in-home use. Movement-intent information could be decoded consistently throughout the 29-weeks in-laboratory study with a mean accuracy of 89.0% (range 78–93.3%). Improvements were observed in both the speed and accuracy of various upper extremity tasks, including lifting small objects and transferring objects to specific targets. At-home decoding accuracy during open-loop trials reached an accuracy of 91.3% (range 80–98.95%) and an accuracy of 88.3% (range 77.6–95.5%) during closed-loop trials. Importantly, the temporal stability of both the functional outcomes and decoder metrics were not explored in this study. A fully implanted brain–computer interface can be safely used to reliably decode movement-intent from motor cortex, allowing for accurate volitional control of hand grasp.